Showing posts with label martin luther king jr.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label martin luther king jr.. Show all posts

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Malcolm X's Critique of Martin Luther King Jr.

The position that I will sketch below is that Malcolm X's criticism of Martin Luther King Jr.'s non-violent strategy was correct, but his charge that Martin was an "Uncle Tom" was incorrect.

Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr. and "Grandfather" Nelson Mandela
One thing we have to bear in mind for both Malcolm and Martin is that their ideas were evolving (no, that doesn't mean that Malcolm fell in love with white people). When Malcolm leveled these charges against King he was speaking as a representative of the Nation of Islam. The NOI had an official policy of disengagement with the civil rights movement, thus his critique is very harsh.

I elaborate on a few points below.

Non-violence
Malcolm was correct about non-violence as a political ideology. To insist on non-violence as a matter of principle is suicidal. Non-violence only makes sense as a tactic that can be changed if the situation dictates. I just came back from a panel discussion on Civil Rights and Black Power. One of the panelists explained that there were courageous, committed, intelligent southerners who believed that marching through the Deep South whilst rejecting self-defense would "get people killed."
Deep South:
Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, South Carolina


Some activist-minded southerners with this view opted to join the Student Non-Violent Coordinating Committee which had, in their view, a more feasible plan that included strategies like voter registration and sit-ins.

Uncle Tom
Malcolm was incorrect about MLK being an "Uncle Tom." The US government considered King to be a threat to the status quo. They kept him under constant surveillance. After Malcolm was forced out of the NOI he began reaching out Civil Rights leaders, including MLK. There is strong evidence that MLK and Malcolm would have eventually joined forces. MLK's position had become so radical--for example, speaking out against the vietnam war and advocating for a redistribution of America's wealth--that even his inner circle sharply criticized him. And while Malcolm was in the NOI he was already starting to articulate his ideas for a "Black United Front." Here is an excerpt from his famous speech Ballot or the Bullet which captures his evolving position well (Malcolm X announced his split with the Nation of Islam in March of 1964. The BOB speech was delivered in Detroit about a month later in early April of 1964):

Shirley Graham Du Bois and Malcolm X
in Accra, Ghana 
"Now in speaking like this, it doesn't mean that we're anti-white, but it does mean we're anti-exploitation, we're anti-degradation, we're anti-oppression. And if the white man doesn't want us to be anti-him, let him stop oppressing and exploiting and degrading us. Whether we are Christians or Muslims or nationalists or agnostics or atheists, we must first learn to forget our differences. If we have differences, let us differ in the closet; when we come out in front, let us not have anything to argue about until we get finished arguing with the man. If the late President Kennedy could get together with Khrushchev and exchange some wheat, we certainly have more in common with each other than Kennedy and Khrushchev had with each other."

You can read the entire speech here or listen to the speech here.

Malcolm X was far more dangerous outside of the Nation of Islam than he had ever been inside the Nation of Islam. He was touring the Middle East and Africa [use keyword "ghana" in search box] garnering support for the Black Freedom Movement and planning on charging the United States government with genocide at the United Nations.                                                                      

Betty Shabazz and Coretta Scott King
"There is abundant evidence of a major high level conspiracy in the assassination of my husband, Martin Luther King, Jr. And the civil court's unanimous verdict has validated our belief. I wholeheartedly applaud the verdict of the jury and I feel that justice has been well served in their deliberations."  Coretta Scott King

In the end both Malcolm and Martin were killed by the US government either directly or indirectly.

tags: Malcolm X, martin luther king jr., betty shabazz, coretta scott king

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Pause: 42nd anniversary of the assassination of Civil Rights Leader, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr





[I pinched this from blogger Jesse Muhammad. GI]


Rather this is just a blog of gratitude for his sacrifice and the sacrifices of his late wife Coretta Scott King and their children. When I was a student at Fonwood Elementary, I remember us only talking about Dr. King during Black History Month when we would do short reenactments of moments during the civil rights movement era. It was during that time we only quoted the "I Have A Dream" speech, so naturally we only saw him as that--"The Dreamer".

But as I got older and read more, I saw Dr. King as more than a dreamer. He was a community soldier and in his last years he began to speak truth to power that disturbed the leaders of the United States at the time.

Read more @ 42nd anniversary of the assassination of Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr

tags: martin luther king jr., assassination, civil rights, southern United States, coretta scott king

Thursday, March 4, 2010

What is Liberation Theology?

Posted by the ghetto intellectual on 2/4/2010


Dig it!


Malcolm X + Martin Luther King, Jr. = James Cone <--- Liberation Theology. GI



The Rev. James Cone is the founder of black liberation theology. In an interview with Terry Gross, Cone explains the movement, which has roots in 1960s civil-rights activism and draws inspiration from both the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X, as “mainly a theology that sees God as concerned with the poor and the weak.” Read more and hear interview of James cone at the Blackbottom.

tags: religion, black power, Malcolm X, martin luther king jr.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Why I Opposed the War in Vietnam



NO dreams or mountain tops in this speech. This is REAL COURAGEOUS TALK...






Martin Luther King,
"Why I Am Opposed to the War in Vietnam"
April 30, 1967, Riverside Church, New York


The sermon which I am preaching this morning in a sense is not the usual kind of sermon, but it is a sermon and an important subject, nevertheless, because the issue that I will be discussing today is one of the most controversial issues confronting our nation. I'm using as a subject from which to preach, "Why I Am Opposed to the War in Vietnam."

Now, let me make it clear in the beginning, that I see this war as an unjust, evil, and futile war. I preach to you today on the war in Vietnam because my conscience leaves me with no other choice. The time has come for America to hear the truth about this tragic war. In international conflicts, the truth is hard to come by because most nations are deceived about themselves. Rationalizations and the incessant search for scapegoats are the psychological cataracts that blind us to our sins. But the day has passed for superficial patriotism. He who lives with untruth lives in spiritual slavery. Freedom is still the bonus we receive for knowing the truth. "Ye shall know the truth," says Jesus, "and the truth shall set you free." Now, I've chosen to preach about the war in Vietnam because I agree with Dante, that the hottest places in hell are reserved for those who in a period of moral crisis maintain their neutrality. There comes a time when silence becomes betrayal.



Read entire speech here.