Showing posts with label the United States. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the United States. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Disgruntled Black Employee quits WikiLeaks and starts AfroLeaks


Image: source

Ok, I made that up. 

But the real story is lame. Apparently, some upstarts @ WikiLeaks are unhappy with their boss, Julian Assange's, leadership style. Their rallying cry? "If you preach transparency to everyone else, you have to be transparent yourself." Their solution? Openleaks, a WikiLeaks rival.

Seriously? 

Sounds kinda corny to me. But beyond corniness are these guys gonna volunteer for the thinly veiled US government-sponsored smear campaign? Are they gonna line up (or queue up for Brit readers) for bogus rape charges and jail time? Will they take the assassin's bullet? I think it would be smarter to keep Assange out front whilst you quietly do your work.

The other criticism of the upstarts is even more suspect--they are complaining that Assange is moving WikiLeaks along "too fast." Sounds vaguely familiar. Sort of like the Civil Rights movement detractors. "Slow down" they said. "We need more time." (No, i'm not comparing WikiLeaks  to Civil Rights. I am just making a point about the conservative posturing of the Openleaks upstarts).

But that's what happens when you have a good business model (or, perhaps, when your underlings are paid off by the government?). Now everyone wants Leaks. I just read somewhere that a disgruntled woman at WikiLeaks has announced plans to start up FemiLeaks. Latino's will soon clamour for LatinoLeaks. Asians will demand AsianLeaks and so on.

But seriously, few people on the planet have been more oppressed by their own government than African Americans. Much of that oppression was brutal and is well documented (slavery, Ku Klux Klan, lynchings, Jim Crow, sun down towns, redlining, vagrancy laws, war on drugs, racial profiling, police brutality, Clarence Thomas). Some of it is still ongoing. But a lot of it was sponsored by COINTELPRO and remains "classified" information. If anyone on the planet merits "transparency" from their government it would be African Americans. 

AfroLeaks might not be a bad idea after all.



Also dig:



tags: wikileaks, civil rights, the United States, cointelpro, fbi, 

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Does the Nation of Islam have the whole (Black) Truth and nothing but the Truth?

Foto del F.B.I. de Wallace Dodd FordImage via Wikipedia

Master Fard Muhammad
In the video below, Brother Dr. Wesley Muhammad demolishes his own argument that the "pyramidians" are not the "whole story" by insisting that Master Fard Muhammad has the whole story. Fard's story is certainly important, but it is no more important than the "pyramidian" narrative. 
American Africans have been revising racist Egyptology since at least David Walker. Walker wrote the following in his book David Walker's Appeal in Four Articles; Together with a Preamble, To the Coloured Citizens of the World, but in Particular, and Very Expressly, to Those of the United States of America:

the Egyptians, were Africans or coloured people, such as we are--some of them yellow and others dark--a mixture of Ethiopians and the natives of Egypt--about the same as you see the coloured people of the United States at the present day” (page 8)


Walker wrote in 1829, roughly one hundred years before Fard (pronounced fah-ROD) Muhammad came on the scene with Supreme Wisdom about the "Asiatic Blackman." Was there truth in the teachings of Master Fard Muhammad and his Messenger, the Honorable Elijah Muhammad? Emphatically, yes. The teachings of the Nation of Islam were absolutely vital to American African struggle. But it was neither the beginning nor the end of the Black Truth. 


If viewing from Facebook, click here.



tags: nation of islam, the United States, religion, islam, master fard muhammad, elijah muhammad, david walker



Monday, March 22, 2010

How Haiti Saved America - The Boston Globe

Posted by the ghetto intellectual on 2/22/2010

Dig it!

From Beecher004 (comment section of Boston Globe):

This article says a lot about how Haiti's slave economy helped us in our fight for freedom in the 18th century, but it barely hints at the way the US slave economy stifled Haitian freedom. The key fact is that, as the article says:

"in 1806, the Jefferson administration succeeded in a ban on all trade with the newly independent nation of Haiti, extinguishing its hopes for prosperity, at the beginning of its new history."

Despite the best efforts of honorable new englanders like our heroic Senator Sumner, Haiti has been far more damaged by US policy than helped.
 




How Haiti Saved America

Two centuries ago, a glittering Caribbean Island helped finance the Revolution

The United States has been leading the response to the Haitian earthquake for all of the reasons that we would expect: our geographical proximity, our competence at emergency response, and our innate generosity. That fits the narrative most of us hold in our heads, for we typically think of Haiti and America as a basket case and a basket, joined only by their contradictions, and the beneficence of one to the other.

On the surface, that is true enough. Haiti was desperately poor well before this latest catastrophe and routinely faces problems that border on the biblical — floods, epidemics, and a deforested landscape that suggests a plague of locusts (sadly, it was just human beings). The United States is the world’s all-time winner, whether defined by Olympic medal count or GDP or any other national sweepstakes.

Yet a closer look at the early history of the United States and Haiti — proudly, the two oldest countries in this hemisphere — suggests that the relationship was once very different. In fact, it was the island’s wealth that turned heads in those days. And the United States was hardly a foregone conclusion. In the darkest days of the American Revolution, when it seemed preposterous to believe that the mighty British empire might allow 13 rogue colonies to come into existence as a new nation, the support that came from a 14th colony — French Saint Domingue, Haiti’s predecessor — made an important difference.

In recent years, the bestseller lists have been dominated by history books arguing that our founding moment is the key to understanding everything that has happened since. That is all well and good — in fact, it’s great news that so many Americans are willing and even eager to read about the 18th century. But to tell the story right, we need to think about all of the people who worked for our independence. In the appeals for aid that have gone out over the last few months, there is one powerful reason for aiding Haiti that has never been articulated. Simply put — the United States might never have come into existence without the help of our island neighbor.

That is a counterintuitive thought, to put it mildly. But to avoid defeat, Americans needed guns and powder and bullets and warm clothing. To buy those necessities, they needed money. And money in those days came from France, eager to twist the tail of the British Lion. France supported America for many reasons, including the ones we learn in school — Benjamin Franklin’s

roguish charm and the appeal of the underdog and England’s comeuppance. But a reason we hear less often is that France had a vested interest in protecting a lucrative overseas possession with a strong connection to the United States, and to New England in particular.

Here in Boston, where the American Revolution is an everyday fact, it helps to pull the camera back, away from this tiny peninsula, and consider the broader hemisphere. In the late 18th century, the situation was very nearly reversed — Haiti’s predecessor, Saint Domingue, was the richest colony in the world. Its capital city, Cap Français (today’s Cap Haïtien) was larger than Boston, and among the most cosmopolitan places in the Americas. Its culture matched anything in New York, Havana, Philadelphia, or the dour Puritan city jutting into Massachusetts Bay.

Early in the century, Benjamin Franklin had learned that modest displays of wit were punishable by jail in Boston — why he soon found it convenient to flee to Philadelphia. In Saint Domingue, by contrast, wit was everything. Comedies were performed at playhouses around the country (the largest theater in Cap Français seated 1,500). Le Cap’s first theater preceded Boston’s by more than 50 years. The historian James E. McClellan III said that Haiti’s scientific clubs “certainly rivaled, if they did not eclipse” those of Philadelphia and Boston. A highly sophisticated urban life sprang into existence — more than 11 towns had more than 1,000 people, and in the capital, all of Cap Français danced to orchestras, laughed at cabarets, played at cards and billiards, and visited wax museums. (In 1789, a waxen George Washington was put on display, in what might have passed for the first state visit by a US president.)

As these accounts would suggest, a great deal of money was made in Saint Domingue. To be “as rich as a Creole” was a familiar boast in Paris, and a substantial portion of the French economy depended on this one distant settlement. This was the jewel of the French empire, furnishing the coffee drunk in Paris, the sugar needed to sweeten it, and the cotton and indigo worn by men and women of fashion. Saint Domingue’s commerce added up to more than a third of France’s foreign trade. One person in eight in France earned a living that stemmed from it. By 1776, this tiny colony produced more income than the entire Spanish empire in the Americas.

But Haiti’s superheated economy required constant, grinding labor in the plantations — and that meant massive importation of human beings from Africa. To a greater degree than in South Carolina or Virginia, the planters of Saint Domingue worked their slaves to death. This was a slave society on a scale beyond anything seen in North America. The profits were bigger, and so were the cruelties, distributed as generously. A small colony of 10,000 square miles — roughly the size of Massachusetts — held a teeming population of Africans, half a million strong, ruled over by a mixture of French families, light-skinned mulattoes, and the profiteering adventurers who always congregate in lively Caribbean cities.

To a surprising degree, Boston was economically linked with a city that was in many ways its polar opposite. New England merchants had been getting rich in Hispaniola since at least 1684, when a young adventurer, William Phips, found a Spanish treasure that made his fortune there. Foodstuffs like dried fish were sold by enterprising Yankees to the rich French island, and the trade in molasses (a run-off of the sugar refining process) became a New England specialty, part of the so-called Triangle Trade. The difficulty of regulating this trade led to the strictures by which England tried and generally failed to bring New England to heel, enraging Americans in the process.

So, well before the first shots were fired at Lexington Green, New Englanders had a mutually beneficial relationship with Saint Domingue that was irritating to England. And France was highly protective of Saint Domingue, which the English had tried on several occasions to seize. All of this provided essential background to the key fact — the French alliance — that allowed the United States to lurch into existence.

Read more @  The Boston Globe

[photo: source]

tags: haiti, civil war, reparations, the United States, france,

Saturday, January 23, 2010

To Heal Haiti, Look to History, Not Nature




This starts off well, but it eventually tells some half truths, understates the brutality of US occupation, no mention of the US removal of Aristide and concludes with a tired half-baked "solution"--markets. 


We must tell OURSTORY and tell it well. Axe! kzs


January 22, 2010
OP-ED CONTRIBUTOR

To Heal Haiti, Look to History, Not Nature





HAITI is everybody’s cherished tragedy. Long before the great earthquake struck the country like a vengeful god, the outside world, and Americans especially, described, defined, marked Haiti most of all by its suffering. Epithets of misery clatter after its name like a ball and chain: Poorest country in the Western Hemisphere. One of the poorest on earth. For decades Haiti’s formidable immiseration has made it among outsiders an object of fascination, wonder and awe. Sometimes the pity that is attached to the land — and we see this increasingly in the news coverage this past week — attains a tone almost sacred, as if Haiti has taken its place as a kind of sacrificial victim among nations, nailed in its bloody suffering to the cross of unending destitution.


And yet there is nothing mystical in Haiti’s pain, no inescapable curse that haunts the land. From independence and before, Haiti’s harms have been caused by men, not demons. Act of nature that it was, the earthquake last week was able to kill so many because of the corruption and weakness of the Haitian state, a state built for predation and plunder. Recovery can come only with vital, even heroic, outside help; but such help, no matter how inspiring the generosity it embodies, will do little to restore Haiti unless it addresses, as countless prior interventions built on transports of sympathy have not, the man-made causes that lie beneath the Haitian malady.


In 1804 the free Republic of Haiti was declared in almost unimaginable triumph: hard to exaggerate the glory of that birth. Hundreds of thousands of enslaved Africans had labored to make Saint-Domingue, as Haiti was then known, the richest colony on earth, a vastly productive slave-powered factory producing tons upon tons of sugar cane, the 18th-century’s great cash crop. For pre-Revolutionary France, Haiti was an inexhaustible cash cow, floating much of its economy. Generation after generation, the second sons of the great French families took ship for Saint-Domingue to preside over the sugar plantations, enjoy the favors of enslaved African women and make their fortunes.


Read entire essay @ the New York Times

tags: african history, france, haiti, imperialism, slavery, the United States