Showing posts with label civil war. Show all posts
Showing posts with label civil war. Show all posts

Monday, March 14, 2011

"Black" Africans hiding from racist "rebels" in Libya

Aljazeera report on Black immigrants stuck in Libya and in fear of their lives. Early on I felt Gaddafi might be at least partially responsible for fomenting this situation, but I don't think I can blame Gaddafi for these assaults. The immigrants were apparently making a go of it until anti-Gaddafi factions began generalized racist attacks on "blacks" perceived to be Gaddafi supporters. 

One interviewee seems to agree with the rumors claiming Gaddafi hired what some in the media have called "black African mercenaries." But I take that to mean that Gaddafi has recruited lots of reinforcements, including black reinforcements. "Blacks" in Libya have become easy targets of anti-Gaddafi rage. These racist attacks aside, I think it is worth noting that, as far as I can tell--and it is impossible to know for certain-- most of the dead in Libya are not "black" Africans, they are "Arabs" and "Berbers."  View the video @ YouTube - Libya: Scared and in Hiding


Also see:

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

Mapping Slavery

Insightful New York Times essay by Susan Schulten on the role of maps in the American Civil War. Quoting from essay:
 

The 1860 Census was the last time the federal government took a count of the South’s vast slave population. Several months later, the United States Coast Survey—arguably the most important scientific agency in the nation at the time—issued two maps of slavery that drew on the Census data, the first of Virginia and the second of Southern states as a whole. Though many Americans knew that dependence on slave labor varied throughout the South, these maps uniquely captured the complexity of the institution and struck a chord with a public hungry for information about the rebellion. 


Also dig:





Monday, March 22, 2010

How Haiti Saved America - The Boston Globe

Posted by the ghetto intellectual on 2/22/2010

Dig it!

From Beecher004 (comment section of Boston Globe):

This article says a lot about how Haiti's slave economy helped us in our fight for freedom in the 18th century, but it barely hints at the way the US slave economy stifled Haitian freedom. The key fact is that, as the article says:

"in 1806, the Jefferson administration succeeded in a ban on all trade with the newly independent nation of Haiti, extinguishing its hopes for prosperity, at the beginning of its new history."

Despite the best efforts of honorable new englanders like our heroic Senator Sumner, Haiti has been far more damaged by US policy than helped.
 




How Haiti Saved America

Two centuries ago, a glittering Caribbean Island helped finance the Revolution

The United States has been leading the response to the Haitian earthquake for all of the reasons that we would expect: our geographical proximity, our competence at emergency response, and our innate generosity. That fits the narrative most of us hold in our heads, for we typically think of Haiti and America as a basket case and a basket, joined only by their contradictions, and the beneficence of one to the other.

On the surface, that is true enough. Haiti was desperately poor well before this latest catastrophe and routinely faces problems that border on the biblical — floods, epidemics, and a deforested landscape that suggests a plague of locusts (sadly, it was just human beings). The United States is the world’s all-time winner, whether defined by Olympic medal count or GDP or any other national sweepstakes.

Yet a closer look at the early history of the United States and Haiti — proudly, the two oldest countries in this hemisphere — suggests that the relationship was once very different. In fact, it was the island’s wealth that turned heads in those days. And the United States was hardly a foregone conclusion. In the darkest days of the American Revolution, when it seemed preposterous to believe that the mighty British empire might allow 13 rogue colonies to come into existence as a new nation, the support that came from a 14th colony — French Saint Domingue, Haiti’s predecessor — made an important difference.

In recent years, the bestseller lists have been dominated by history books arguing that our founding moment is the key to understanding everything that has happened since. That is all well and good — in fact, it’s great news that so many Americans are willing and even eager to read about the 18th century. But to tell the story right, we need to think about all of the people who worked for our independence. In the appeals for aid that have gone out over the last few months, there is one powerful reason for aiding Haiti that has never been articulated. Simply put — the United States might never have come into existence without the help of our island neighbor.

That is a counterintuitive thought, to put it mildly. But to avoid defeat, Americans needed guns and powder and bullets and warm clothing. To buy those necessities, they needed money. And money in those days came from France, eager to twist the tail of the British Lion. France supported America for many reasons, including the ones we learn in school — Benjamin Franklin’s

roguish charm and the appeal of the underdog and England’s comeuppance. But a reason we hear less often is that France had a vested interest in protecting a lucrative overseas possession with a strong connection to the United States, and to New England in particular.

Here in Boston, where the American Revolution is an everyday fact, it helps to pull the camera back, away from this tiny peninsula, and consider the broader hemisphere. In the late 18th century, the situation was very nearly reversed — Haiti’s predecessor, Saint Domingue, was the richest colony in the world. Its capital city, Cap Français (today’s Cap Haïtien) was larger than Boston, and among the most cosmopolitan places in the Americas. Its culture matched anything in New York, Havana, Philadelphia, or the dour Puritan city jutting into Massachusetts Bay.

Early in the century, Benjamin Franklin had learned that modest displays of wit were punishable by jail in Boston — why he soon found it convenient to flee to Philadelphia. In Saint Domingue, by contrast, wit was everything. Comedies were performed at playhouses around the country (the largest theater in Cap Français seated 1,500). Le Cap’s first theater preceded Boston’s by more than 50 years. The historian James E. McClellan III said that Haiti’s scientific clubs “certainly rivaled, if they did not eclipse” those of Philadelphia and Boston. A highly sophisticated urban life sprang into existence — more than 11 towns had more than 1,000 people, and in the capital, all of Cap Français danced to orchestras, laughed at cabarets, played at cards and billiards, and visited wax museums. (In 1789, a waxen George Washington was put on display, in what might have passed for the first state visit by a US president.)

As these accounts would suggest, a great deal of money was made in Saint Domingue. To be “as rich as a Creole” was a familiar boast in Paris, and a substantial portion of the French economy depended on this one distant settlement. This was the jewel of the French empire, furnishing the coffee drunk in Paris, the sugar needed to sweeten it, and the cotton and indigo worn by men and women of fashion. Saint Domingue’s commerce added up to more than a third of France’s foreign trade. One person in eight in France earned a living that stemmed from it. By 1776, this tiny colony produced more income than the entire Spanish empire in the Americas.

But Haiti’s superheated economy required constant, grinding labor in the plantations — and that meant massive importation of human beings from Africa. To a greater degree than in South Carolina or Virginia, the planters of Saint Domingue worked their slaves to death. This was a slave society on a scale beyond anything seen in North America. The profits were bigger, and so were the cruelties, distributed as generously. A small colony of 10,000 square miles — roughly the size of Massachusetts — held a teeming population of Africans, half a million strong, ruled over by a mixture of French families, light-skinned mulattoes, and the profiteering adventurers who always congregate in lively Caribbean cities.

To a surprising degree, Boston was economically linked with a city that was in many ways its polar opposite. New England merchants had been getting rich in Hispaniola since at least 1684, when a young adventurer, William Phips, found a Spanish treasure that made his fortune there. Foodstuffs like dried fish were sold by enterprising Yankees to the rich French island, and the trade in molasses (a run-off of the sugar refining process) became a New England specialty, part of the so-called Triangle Trade. The difficulty of regulating this trade led to the strictures by which England tried and generally failed to bring New England to heel, enraging Americans in the process.

So, well before the first shots were fired at Lexington Green, New Englanders had a mutually beneficial relationship with Saint Domingue that was irritating to England. And France was highly protective of Saint Domingue, which the English had tried on several occasions to seize. All of this provided essential background to the key fact — the French alliance — that allowed the United States to lurch into existence.

Read more @  The Boston Globe

[photo: source]

tags: haiti, civil war, reparations, the United States, france,

Monday, December 21, 2009

Umkhonto we Sizwe--Spear of the Nation (ANC guerilla unit)

This document, first circulated in 1961, explains the African National Congress's decision to take up arms against the White Nationalist government.




Manifesto of Umkhonto we Sizwe






Leaflet issued by the Command of Umkhonto we Sizwe, 16th December 1961




Units of Umkhonto we Sizwe today carried out planned attacks against government installations, particularly those connected with the policy of apartheid and race discrimination.

Umkhonto we Sizwe is a new, independent body, formed by Africans, It includes in its ranks South Africans of all races It is not connected in any way with a so-called 'Committee for National Liberation' whose existence has been announced in the press. Umkhonto we Sizwe will carry on the struggle for freedom and democracy by new methods, which are necessary to complement the actions of the established national liberation organisations. Umkhonto we Sizwe fully supports the national liberation movement, and our members jointly and individually, place themselves under the overall political guidance of that movement.

It is, however, well known that the main national liberation organisations in this country have consistently followed a policy of non-violence. They have conducted themselves peaceably at all times, regardless of government attacks and persecutions upon them, and despite all government-inspired attempts to provoke them to violence. They have done so because the people prefer peaceful methods of change to achieve their aspirations without the suffering and bitterness of civil war. But the people's patience is not endless.

Read entire document here.

Photo credit: Daily Mail

tags: ANC, apartheid, civil war, South Africa

Thursday, December 10, 2009

South Sudan leaders released- Al Jazeera

I first started watching Al Jazeera back in 2007 when I was doing research in Ghana. If you want to get balanced reporting on Africa this is probably as good as it gets for the large media houses. The Nation of Islam's paper, the Final Call, has done a good job of staying on top of developments in Sudan.  Akbar Muhammad, International Representative of the NOI has been on several fact-finding missions in Sudan. Minister Farrakhan and Akbar Muhammad do a great job of explaining how colorism and Arabization have led to oppression in Sudan. They also correctly point out that (1) the rebel groups must shoulder some responsibility for the excesses of the conflct and (2) Israel is using conflict in Sudan to stir up anti-Islamic sentiment. These are all important points, but they should not prevent the NOI from strongly denouncing Bashir's belligerence.

Below is an article about two leaders of the rebel group Sudanese Peoples Liberation Movement. who were jailed in Khartoum and later released.


NEWS AFRICA
South Sudan leaders released









The SPLM's Arman, left, and Amum, right, celebrated their release in Khartoum [AFP]




Three senior leaders of the southern Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM) have been released after being briefly held in a police crackdown against an opposition protest in Khartoum, an AFP news agency reporter said.
Police arrested the three figures and dozens of protesters on Monday during a protest to demand changes to the country's electoral law.
Pagan Amum, Yassir Arman and Abbas Gumma from the Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM) were led away as they arrived by car at the parliament building in Khartoum's twin city of Omdurman.

Amum is the SPLM's secretary-general, Arman its deputy secretary general in northern Sudan, and Gumma is a state minister at the country's interior ministry. Amun was moved to a local jail.
Protesters in south Sudan responded to the arrests by torching the offices of the country's ruling National Congress Party (NCP), a southern government official said.
Salva Kiir, the president of South Sudan, condemned the arrests, saying they broke the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA) of 2005 that ended a devastating 22-year civil war between north and south.

"These arrests are not only provocative but unjustified, because the interim national constitution of the Sudan and the CPA allow for peaceful and democratic procession," Kiir said, who is also first vice-president in a national unity government in Khartoum.


'Illegal' protests
Police had announced that the electoral reform demonstrations would be considered illegal. However, several hundred opposition protesters marched on the streets of Khartoum and Omdurman, waving placards and chanting: "We want our freedom."
Police, who initially trailed the demonstration, used tear-gas to disperse them and beat protesters with batons.

Also among those arrested were Barmina Awrial, Khartoum's state minister for health, and Siddig al-Turabi, son of Hassan al-Turabi, the veteran opposition National Islamic Front leader, along with more than 70 others.

Security forces blocked roads leading to parliament, with a heavy presence in key areas. They also closed the bridge to Omdurman, which lies on the west bank of the Nile river across from Khartoum.
"The security committee for Khartoum state has met and decided that the protest is illegal," Mohammed Babikir, a senior police officer said on state television late Sunday. "Whoever takes part in this demonstration will be breaking the law," he said, shortly after Arman had told journalists he expected "thousands of our people" to take part.


The vote will be Sudan's first since 1986 [AFP] 

The SPLM and the ruling NCP of Omar al-Bashir, the president of Sudan, have failed to agree on democratic reforms ahead of elections next April.
They have also yet to agree on a law for the south's referendum scheduled for January 2011.
The national vote will be the first in Sudan since 1986, three years before al-Bashir toppled a democratically elected government in a bloodless military coup.

The SPLM and around 20 opposition groups called for a "peaceful protest" to exert pressure on the NCP. Khartoum state announced the closure of schools on Monday and a day off for public employees to underline the government's "engagement ... towards democratic reform" and to aid voter registration.
Reform and changes to the election law were key aspects of the 2005 CPA.


 Source:
Agencies




Source: Al Jazeera

Tags: bashir, civil war, islam, louis farrakhan, nation of islam, Sudan