Image via Wikipedia
I pinched this essay from Congolese activist Kambale Musavuli. Kambale was kind enough to allow me to include his commentary with the post. Kambale thinks that Kagame's iron-clad grip on Rwanda is slipping:
 |
| Yoweri Museveni chats with Paul Kagame |
I'm telling you... this is how they get rid of African leaders... I have learned the west for a while... I saw this with Mobutu, former president of the Congo before 1996 who was a brutal dictator supported by the west.<><><><><><><>
First they get you to betray your country... then they take resources they need and stockpile it... w...hen lots of voices of dissent start making too much noise and getting to the citizens in the West, they go back to the basics. They get their intellectuals to start writing to justify their actions... then they will take "preemptive actions" to save the Africans.
I'm telling you... Kagame's time are numbered. When you see folks such as NY Times, Financial Times, Bloomberg, BBC, and now Foreign Policy start writing about something that has been going on for 16 years and they were silent... I have to take a step back and urge the Rwandan youth to be wise and work on reconciliation today.
Kagame is going down... but you should not go down with him if you stand for justice today and work for true reconciliation.
The Paul Kagame I Know
Rwanda's president fought to end the country's 1994 genocide -- then used it to justify his own awful rule.
BY ROBERT KRUEGER | AUGUST 5, 2010 @ Foreign Policy
On Aug. 9, Paul Kagame's mandate as president of Rwanda will be renewed in an election in which he will probably receive, as before, about 94 percent of the vote. Rwandan journalists who criticized him are in prison; some of his earlier would-be opponents are dead, in prison, or in exile. Rwandan elections have no more uncertainty than those in the Soviet Politburo of Brezhnev's day.
Some American church leaders will be pleased that Kagame, whom they see as a God-fearing man, will continue to lead a nation that suffered the planet's worst genocide in the last 20 years. Many corporate leaders and economists will be pleased that the government of a Central African country claiming the fastest economic growth in its region has won again. Only justice, democracy, and the silent and terrified majority of the Rwandan population will have lost.
I first met Kagame in September 1994, just two months after the Tutsi forces of the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) had defeated the Hutu genocidaires and captured the capital city of Kigali. As U.S. ambassador to neighboring Burundi, I had been invited to join U.S. Undersecretary of State Tim Wirth and U.S. Ambassador to Rwanda David Rawson for a two-hour meeting with Kagame, then the leader of the RPF. On the drive to his headquarters in downtown Kigali from the airport, half the buildings in the capital still lacked windows; shattered glass littered the streets.
We entered a large, shadowy office with cement floors and walls. The most striking thing in the room was Kagame himself, a man with a sorcerer's air about him, dressed in a dark suit too large for his rail-thin body. (Fine tailoring is often a victim of civil war, especially for guerrilla leaders.)
My perceptions of Kagame undoubtedly had been shaped by my earlier interviews with some of the 100,000 Rwandan Hutu refugees who had arrived in Burundi over the previous two months. They had been coming at a rate of more than 1,000 a day since Kagame's victory, and were living on bare ground under blue plastic sheeting provided by the United Nations, stretched over branches torn from surrounding trees. When I asked them when they would return home, they invariably replied, "Whenever the RPF stops killing us." A counter-genocide by Kagame's all-Tutsi force, they said, was mercilessly slaughtering the Hutu population.
Kagame surely knew all that, but of course refused to admit it when I questioned him. I found him to be shrewd, well spoken, and careful. He never directly denied my statements, but always refused to take responsibility for the RPF's campaign of revenge. And the United States and the U.N. preferred to believe that the Tutsi victors were better than the defeated Hutu forces. Emerging from the meeting into the darkened streets of Kigali, I knew there would be no equal justice or real democracy as long as Kagame held power.
No comments:
Post a Comment